Is it possible to get the positions from particles to connect objects to them which are NOT part of the particle system?
Greetings
Christian
Hello Ventuzians!
THE FORUMS ARE CLOSED!
Please join our discord server HERE!! << click me
We are shutting our Ventuz Forum, but don't worry, it will all be archived for you to search in if you have a query. From now on, please add all your comments, questions or observations into our Discord Server
Thanks for the great time - see you on discord!!
Dee, Karol, Daniel and the whoooole Product and Support team!
THE FORUMS ARE CLOSED!
Please join our discord server HERE!! << click me
We are shutting our Ventuz Forum, but don't worry, it will all be archived for you to search in if you have a query. From now on, please add all your comments, questions or observations into our Discord Server
Thanks for the great time - see you on discord!!
Dee, Karol, Daniel and the whoooole Product and Support team!
Particle position
Moderator: Support
-
- Posts: 666
- Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 20:56
- Location: wuppertal
- Contact:
- Dierk Ohlerich
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 10 Jul 2012, 09:01
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Re: Particle position
Hi,
We do not provide nodes to read back particle positions.
6.01.00 will feature particle touch. The major limitation of this is that the collision detection will work only for spheres, independent of how the particles are drawn.
The particles are calculated in the GPU, and if the CPU wants to read the particle position back from the GPU this will cause a 2-3 frame delay, because the CPU is already sending commands for the next frame while the GPU is still busy drawing the current frame.
Attaching an object to a particle with the delay would look ugly. Particle touch also has a 2-3 frame delay, which is acceptable for interaction (actually, in interlace, this is a field delay).
-- Dierk
We do not provide nodes to read back particle positions.
6.01.00 will feature particle touch. The major limitation of this is that the collision detection will work only for spheres, independent of how the particles are drawn.
The particles are calculated in the GPU, and if the CPU wants to read the particle position back from the GPU this will cause a 2-3 frame delay, because the CPU is already sending commands for the next frame while the GPU is still busy drawing the current frame.
Attaching an object to a particle with the delay would look ugly. Particle touch also has a 2-3 frame delay, which is acceptable for interaction (actually, in interlace, this is a field delay).
-- Dierk
-- Dierk Ohlerich
-
- Posts: 666
- Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 20:56
- Location: wuppertal
- Contact:
Re: Particle position
Hi Dierk
Thank your for the info!
Greetings
Christian
Thank your for the info!
Greetings
Christian