All other topics about Ventuz 5 here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alexander Vartzbed
Posts: 6
Joined: 25 Aug 2015, 08:58


Post by Alexander Vartzbed » 19 Dec 2016, 07:53

I was wondering, as we still very often get mixed responses, what is best used, PNG files or DDS for Images & Textures?

We have always used DDS, then moved to PNGs for some reason and I wanted to know what the community actually says.

go back to DDS, or stay with PNG?



User avatar
Posts: 265
Joined: 06 Sep 2013, 07:14
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: DDS vs PNG

Post by lerou » 19 Dec 2016, 08:46

My 2 cents: As long as I don't have to use DDS, I stick to PNG. The workflow is easier as all applications can handle it. And it compresses lossless. I switch to DDS when I have memory restrictions (think of a gallery with hundreds of images, non-alpha DDS is 1/8 the size of PNG) or I need fast loading times (like a dynamic gallery where you can swipe through images and need to reload them quickly). So as long as memory and performance are ok, I avoid DDS.


Post Reply